<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with Graphic Designers Martin Venezky, Jon Sueda and Scott Thorpe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trip.citiesxdesign.org/2009/07/an-interview-with-graphic-designers-martin-venezky-jon-sueda-and-scott-thorpe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trip.citiesxdesign.org/2009/07/an-interview-with-graphic-designers-martin-venezky-jon-sueda-and-scott-thorpe/</link>
	<description>Cities x Design tells the story of how promoting local creativity and design adds value to cities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 10:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://trip.citiesxdesign.org/2009/07/an-interview-with-graphic-designers-martin-venezky-jon-sueda-and-scott-thorpe/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trip.citiesxdesign.org/?p=1303#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Nice - Great Ideas and Topics.

Corporations and creative process a strange bedfellow indeed - why do we still need to justify/explain creative process to these folks? I have some ideas - but I am not sure it is possible or necessary? I rarely question my plumbers process - but I guess he is not &quot;speaking&quot; for me?? Maybe that is the issue - when we begin to speak for others. We become conduits for the corporation, they have in invested interest? RIght?   I have been hammering away at this for 20 years or so now - and rarely does the project allow a laboratory environment!  How can this BE???? I am in the wrong business?? 

It is rewarding when you get the project that does allow this sort of exploration!

In my humble view - design practice is still stuck primarily in a pragmatic communicative idea solving/selling science. Art making is about communicating solely  from within, with personal constraints voluntarily placed and chosen based on my own experiences and interests.  Is there a contradiction within these to processes overlapping? I have found it to be true!  Designers do create artworks for sure - I hate the fact we need to justify it as Art. But I kinda understand why.   When I follow my personal processes I arrive at a more personal solution, the scales tip from corporate communication to artful solution. I believe there is plenty of room for this - depending again on the client and message. My contention has always been about pursuing my own process within imposed constraints  - and how I need to justify this within a creative team as well!? Having all the answers before beginning a project does not allow for discovery, ideas to proliferate. 

I love the comment about risks and taking them within the boundaries of a design project. This is what I respect about each of the speakers work. If we do not take risks how do we learn and stay inquisitive about the world and our own process. I know I become dead if I merely push pixels and arrive at the most obvious solution.

BOOOORING.

Thanks guys, now back to advertising.....sigh

PS you guys need a better MIC - or compression rate!??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8211; Great Ideas and Topics.</p>
<p>Corporations and creative process a strange bedfellow indeed &#8211; why do we still need to justify/explain creative process to these folks? I have some ideas &#8211; but I am not sure it is possible or necessary? I rarely question my plumbers process &#8211; but I guess he is not &#8220;speaking&#8221; for me?? Maybe that is the issue &#8211; when we begin to speak for others. We become conduits for the corporation, they have in invested interest? RIght?   I have been hammering away at this for 20 years or so now &#8211; and rarely does the project allow a laboratory environment!  How can this BE???? I am in the wrong business?? </p>
<p>It is rewarding when you get the project that does allow this sort of exploration!</p>
<p>In my humble view &#8211; design practice is still stuck primarily in a pragmatic communicative idea solving/selling science. Art making is about communicating solely  from within, with personal constraints voluntarily placed and chosen based on my own experiences and interests.  Is there a contradiction within these to processes overlapping? I have found it to be true!  Designers do create artworks for sure &#8211; I hate the fact we need to justify it as Art. But I kinda understand why.   When I follow my personal processes I arrive at a more personal solution, the scales tip from corporate communication to artful solution. I believe there is plenty of room for this &#8211; depending again on the client and message. My contention has always been about pursuing my own process within imposed constraints  &#8211; and how I need to justify this within a creative team as well!? Having all the answers before beginning a project does not allow for discovery, ideas to proliferate. </p>
<p>I love the comment about risks and taking them within the boundaries of a design project. This is what I respect about each of the speakers work. If we do not take risks how do we learn and stay inquisitive about the world and our own process. I know I become dead if I merely push pixels and arrive at the most obvious solution.</p>
<p>BOOOORING.</p>
<p>Thanks guys, now back to advertising&#8230;..sigh</p>
<p>PS you guys need a better MIC &#8211; or compression rate!??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: trip.citiesxdesign.org @ 2012-02-05 08:37:45 -->
